GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 760M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 850M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 16,135 vs 3,395 More than 4.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher clock speed 902 MHz vs 628 MHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 936 MHz vs 657 MHz More than 40% higher turbo clock speed
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 14,358.5 vs 12,477 More than 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher bioshock infinite framerate 28.4 vs 20 More than 40% higher bioshock infinite framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 28.4 fps vs 20 fps More than 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Slightly higher crysis 3 framerate 14 fps vs 13 fps Around 10% higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score 1,215 vs 1,020 Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 760M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,221 vs 4,385.5 Around 4.5x better 3DMark06 score
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 2,002 MHz More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better manhattan score 3,705.63 vs 1,764.49 More than 2x better manhattan score
Much higher diablo III framerate 94 fps vs 61 fps Around 55% higher diablo III framerate
Higher memory bandwidth 64.1 GB/s vs 32 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Slightly better ocean surface simulation score 510 frames/s vs 388.46 frames/s More than 30% better ocean surface simulation score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 850M vs 760M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 850M
150.96 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 760M
53.99 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 850M
37.72 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 760M
15.67 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Read more

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
Besides in some models of laptop as mine I notice from gpu-z that gtx760m is set on clock of great boost of 10 or 15%. Then for deduction it would be very stronger than described here, already slightly superior to gtx850m and therefore more neighbor to a gtx765m or gtx860m. The benchmarks are not always objective.
They are the same performance. ^^
is to adjourn this comparison with driver more adjourned, isn't possible that the discrepancy is very great with 3dmark11, considering that more recent windows 8.1 use directx 11???
comments powered by Disqus