GeForce GTX 850M vs 760M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 760M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 16,135 | vs | 3,395 | More than 4.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 902 MHz | vs | 628 MHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 936 MHz | vs | 657 MHz | More than 40% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 14,358.5 | vs | 12,477 | More than 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 28.4 | vs | 20 | More than 40% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 28.4 fps | vs | 20 fps | More than 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Slightly higher crysis 3 framerate | 14 fps | vs | 13 fps | Around 10% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 1,215 | vs | 1,020 | Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 19,221 | vs | 4,385.5 | Around 4.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,008 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,705.63 | vs | 1,764.49 | More than 2x better manhattan score | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 94 fps | vs | 61 fps | Around 55% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64.1 GB/s | vs | 32 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly better ocean surface simulation score | 510 frames/s | vs | 388.46 frames/s | More than 30% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 850M vs 760M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 7 laptops with the GeForce GTX 850M, starting from $800
- 2 laptops with the GeForce GTX 760M, starting from $1,110
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 850M vs 860M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 850M vs 750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 850M vs 840M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 850M vs 950M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 850M vs R9 M265X | ||
| | VS |  |
| 850M vs 765M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 850M vs 960M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
