GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 765M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 850M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 16,135 vs 4,021 More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 902 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly better particle simulation score 432.03 mInteraction/s vs 71.96 mInteraction/s More than 6x better particle simulation score
Higher turbo clock speed 936 MHz vs 863 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 45W vs 75W 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 4,385.5 Around 4.5x better 3DMark06 score
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 2,002 MHz More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 64.1 GB/s vs 32 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better T-Rex score 3,352.1 vs 1,940.47 Around 75% better T-Rex score
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 36.1 GTexel/s More than 40% higher texture rate
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 61 fps Around 85% higher diablo III framerate
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 57.85 fps More than 20% higher dead space 3 framerate
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 28.15 vs 20.4 Around 40% higher battlefield 4 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 850M vs 765M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 850M
151.37 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 765M
19.76 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 850M
37.61 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 765M
8.79 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4


Showing 4 comments.
Actually there are quite a few gtx 850s with Gddr5 around...
is to adjourn this comparison with driver more adjourned, isn't possible that the discrepancy is very great with 3dmark11, considering that more recent windows 8.1 use directx 11???
but there is no GD5 version of GTX850M on offer....
You are used the DDR3 version GTX850m. The comparison is not objectively.
comments powered by Disqus