GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 765M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 850M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 16,135 vs 4,021 More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 902 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly better particle simulation score 478.92 mInteraction/s vs 71.88 mInteraction/s Around 6.8x better particle simulation score
Higher turbo clock speed 936 MHz vs 863 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 45W vs 75W 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 4,385.5 Around 4.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 2,002 MHz More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 64.1 GB/s vs 32 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 36.1 GTexel/s More than 40% higher texture rate
Significantly better T-Rex score 3,352.1 vs 1,940.47 Around 75% better T-Rex score
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Significantly higher battlefield 3 framerate 22.9 vs 22 Around 5% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 61 fps Around 85% higher diablo III framerate
Higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 57.85 fps More than 20% higher dead space 3 framerate
Slightly higher battlefield 4 framerate 28.15 vs 20.4 Around 40% higher battlefield 4 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 850M vs 765M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 850M
158.32 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 765M
19.6 mHash/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
Actually there are quite a few gtx 850s with Gddr5 around...
is to adjourn this comparison with driver more adjourned, isn't possible that the discrepancy is very great with 3dmark11, considering that more recent windows 8.1 use directx 11???
but there is no GD5 version of GTX850M on offer....
You are used the DDR3 version GTX850m. The comparison is not objectively.
comments powered by Disqus