GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 765M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3 and Diablo III

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 850M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 16,551.5 vs 4,021 More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 902 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 936 MHz vs 863 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 28.4 fps vs 23.25 fps More than 20% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Lower TDP 45W vs 75W 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 4,458 Around 4.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 64.1 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Better passmark score 2,083 vs 1,538 More than 35% better passmark score
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 36.1 GTexel/s More than 40% higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 61 fps Around 85% higher diablo III framerate
More shading units 768 vs 640 128 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 850M vs 765M

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 850M
28.4 fps
GeForce GTX 765M
23.25 fps
Being able to play top titles like Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs at these quality settings and at 1920x1080 resolution was impressive.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

Dead Space 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset

For Ultrabooks and thinner machines you’ll have to step down to smaller, less power hungry GPUs like the GT 750 and 740 but even then we expect NVIDIA to have much faster gaming performance than the Haswell-based processor graphics.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
is to adjourn this comparison with driver more adjourned, isn't possible that the discrepancy is very great with 3dmark11, considering that more recent windows 8.1 use directx 11???
but there is no GD5 version of GTX850M on offer....
You are used the DDR3 version GTX850m. The comparison is not objectively.
comments powered by Disqus