GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 860M vs 750M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3 and Diablo III

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M  based on its compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 860M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 21,431 vs 2,543 Around 8.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 18,345 vs 8,200 Around 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,029 MHz vs 941 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,317 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS More than 80% better floating-point performance
Better passmark score 2,097 vs 1,500 Around 40% better passmark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 4,000 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 64 GB/s More than 25% higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 16.5 GPixel/s vs 7.53 GPixel/s Around 2.2x higher pixel rate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 967 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Higher texture rate 41.2 GTexel/s vs 30.1 GTexel/s More than 35% higher texture rate
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 41 fps vs 15.9 fps More than 2.5x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Significantly higher dead space 3 framerate 84.5 fps vs 39.5 fps Around 2.2x higher dead space 3 framerate
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
Better passmark direct compute score 1,575 vs 734 Around 2.2x better passmark direct compute score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 18.9 fps vs 9.85 fps More than 90% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher diablo III framerate 105.24 fps vs 66.6 fps Around 60% higher diablo III framerate
Slightly more texture mapping units 40 vs 32 8 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 13,670 vs 4,917.5 More than 2.8x better 3DMark06 score
Lower TDP 50W vs 75W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 860M vs GT 750M

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

It managed to score P5339 in 3DMark 11 performance preset and X1662 in the extreme preset.
GeForce GTX 860M | by Slobodan-Simic (Mar, 2014)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GeForce GTX 860M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

GeForce GTX 860M
18.9 fps
GeForce GT 750M
9.85 fps

Dead Space 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset

GeForce GTX 860M
84.5 fps
GeForce GT 750M
39.5 fps
You can see the full slide deck in the gallery at the end with a few additional details, but GeForce Experience is a new software tool that’s designed to automatically adjust supported games to the “best quality for your hardware” setting.
GeForce GTX 860M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus