Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 860M vs GT 750M |
Released January, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7 Out of 10
by Tim-Verry (Jun, 2013)These chips are still based on Kepler (600-series), but feature more CUDA cores, more memory, a wider memory bus, and faster clockspeeds.
VS
Released January, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
- 941 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.5 Out of 10
by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)Looking at HD 4000 performance with Core i5 ULV and Core i7 quad-core, you can see that the quad-core part is anywhere from 0% to around 60% faster.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 860M vs 750M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher dead space 3 framerate | 84.5 fps | vs | 39.5 fps | Around 2.2x higher dead space 3 framerate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 23,220.5 | vs | 2,543 | Around 9.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 18,276.5 | vs | 8,200 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 941 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 105.24 fps | vs | 66.6 fps | Around 60% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,012 MHz | vs | 4,000 MHz | More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,305.6 GFLOPS | vs | 722.7 GFLOPS | More than 80% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 16.32 GPixel/s | vs | 7.53 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better bitcoin mining score | 162.9 mHash/s | vs | 27.59 mHash/s | Around 6x better bitcoin mining score | |||
| Better cloud gate factor score | 17.52 | vs | 13.2 | Around 35% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,085 MHz | vs | 967 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,253 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 41.57 fps | vs | 16.3 fps | More than 2.5x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 18.75 fps | vs | 9.85 fps | More than 90% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,593 | vs | 733 | Around 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 13,670 | vs | 4,902 | More than 2.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 860M vs GT 750M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 29 laptops with the GeForce GTX 860M, starting from $829
- 14 laptops with the GeForce GT 750M, starting from $799
