Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M based on its compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 860M vs GT 750M |
Released January, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
8.1 Out of 10
by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
VS
Released January, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
- 941 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.5 Out of 10
by Slobodan-Simic (Feb, 2014)Although we have no idea from which partner this GTX 750 comes, it features a rather simple dual-slot cooler and standard PCB design with a 2+1-phase VRM which draws power from a single 6-pin PCI-Express power connector.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 860M vs 750M
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| BioShock Infinite and Crysis 3 | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Passmark Direct Compute | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 20,419 | vs | 2,543 | More than 8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 18,345 | vs | 8,200 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better passmark score | 2,794 | vs | 1,529 | Around 85% better passmark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,029 MHz | vs | 941 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,317 GFLOPS | vs | 722.7 GFLOPS | More than 80% better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 16.5 GPixel/s | vs | 7.53 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher texture rate | 41.2 GTexel/s | vs | 30.1 GTexel/s | More than 35% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 42.5 fps | vs | 15.9 fps | Around 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Significantly better passmark direct compute score | 1,551 | vs | 738 | More than 2x better passmark direct compute score | |||
| Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 19.05 fps | vs | 9.85 fps | Around 95% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 32 | 8 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 13,670 | vs | 4,946 | More than 2.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 860M vs GT 750M
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
GeForce GTX 860M | by Slobodan-Simic (Mar, 2014)It managed to score P5339 in 3DMark 11 performance preset and X1662 in the extreme preset.
