GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 860M vs 560M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 860M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,220.5 vs 1,820 More than 12.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 775 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 18,276.5 vs 8,003.5 More than 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 2,500 MHz More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher dirt3 framerate 56 vs 23 Around 2.5x higher dirt3 framerate
Much higher diablo III framerate 105.24 fps vs 44.2 fps Around 2.5x higher diablo III framerate
Better floating-point performance 1,305.6 GFLOPS vs 595.2 GFLOPS Around 2.2x better floating-point performance
Much higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 625 MHz More than 2x higher memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 6.2 GPixel/s Around 2.8x higher pixel rate
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 60 GB/s Around 35% higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 40.8 GTexel/s vs 24.8 GTexel/s Around 65% higher texture rate
More shading units 640 vs 192 448 more shading units
Better bitcoin mining score 162.9 mHash/s vs 44.12 mHash/s Around 3.8x better bitcoin mining score
Better cloud gate factor score 17.52 vs 12.76 More than 35% better cloud gate factor score
Better manhattan score 3,742.78 vs 3,379.02 More than 10% better manhattan score
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,593 vs 677 More than 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 560M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 15,327 vs 4,902 Around 3.2x better 3DMark06 score
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 860M vs 560M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 860M
162.9 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 560M
44.12 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 860M
22.83 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 560M
13.64 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus