Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 860M vs 570M |
Released January, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7 Out of 10
by Tim-Verry (Jun, 2013)These chips are still based on Kepler (600-series), but feature more CUDA cores, more memory, a wider memory bus, and faster clockspeeds.
VS
Released June, 2011
Nvidia GeForce GTX 570M
- 575 MHz
- 1.5 GB GDDR5
6.3 Out of 10
by Trace-Hagan (May, 2013)The range is powered by Kepler from bottom to top and brings great performance to mobile platforms.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 860M vs 570M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 575 MHz | More than 75% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 18,276.5 | vs | 9,591 | More than 90% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 23,220.5 | vs | 17,004.5 | More than 35% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 4,902 | vs | 2,399 | More than 2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,012 MHz | vs | 3,000 MHz | More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,363.28 | vs | 1,848.05 | More than 80% better T-Rex score | |||
| Much higher dirt3 framerate | 56 | vs | 33.7 | More than 65% higher dirt3 framerate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,305.6 GFLOPS | vs | 772.8 GFLOPS | Around 70% better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,253 MHz | vs | 750 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 16.32 GPixel/s | vs | 8.05 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better bitcoin mining score | 162.83 mHash/s | vs | 66.19 mHash/s | Around 2.5x better bitcoin mining score | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 336 | 304 more shading units | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 33.42 | vs | 18.78 | Around 80% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,593 | vs | 829 | More than 90% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 40 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 860M vs 570M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 3
Dirt3
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 28 laptops with the GeForce GTX 860M, starting from $831
- 4 laptops with the GeForce GTX 570M, starting from $186
