GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 860M vs 675M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 860M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,220.5 vs 3,218 Around 7.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 620 MHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 18,276.5 vs 13,805 More than 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 3,000 MHz More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed
Much better T-Rex score 3,359.92 vs 3,350.04 Almost the same
Much higher diablo III framerate 105.24 fps vs 73.91 fps More than 40% higher diablo III framerate
Better bitcoin mining score 162.83 mHash/s vs 59.01 mHash/s More than 2.8x better bitcoin mining score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 750 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 18.75 fps vs 13.9 fps Around 35% higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly higher pixel rate 16.32 GPixel/s vs 9.92 GPixel/s Around 65% higher pixel rate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,593 vs 1,021 More than 55% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 41.57 fps vs 28.6 fps More than 45% higher BioShock infinite framerate
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
Higher metro: last light framerate 27.85 vs 20.7 Around 35% higher metro: last light framerate
Better sky diver factor score 253.8 vs 189.12 Around 35% better sky diver factor score
Lower TDP 75W vs 100W 25% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 675M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 20,452.5 vs 4,902 Around 4.2x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 2,142 vs 1,719 Around 25% better PassMark score
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 860M vs 675M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 860M
162.83 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 675M
59.01 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 860M
22.83 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 675M
22.12 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Crysis 3

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus