GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 860M vs 760

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite and Crysis 3

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 860M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 22,714.5 vs 8,730 More than 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,029 MHz vs 980 MHz 5% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 1,032 MHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 75W vs 170W 2.3x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 760

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 24,480 vs 4,920 Around 5x better 3DMark06 score
Better passmark score 4,981 vs 2,101 More than 2.2x better passmark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 30,030 vs 18,345 Around 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 94.1 GTexel/s vs 41.2 GTexel/s More than 2.2x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 2,258 GFLOPS vs 1,317 GFLOPS More than 70% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 58.7 fps vs 18.9 fps More than 3x higher crysis 3 framerate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
More texture mapping units 96 vs 40 56 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 23.5 GPixel/s vs 16.5 GPixel/s More than 40% higher pixel rate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 68.2 fps vs 41 fps More than 65% higher BioShock infinite framerate
More shading units 1,152 vs 640 512 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Better passmark direct compute score 2,334 vs 1,575 Around 50% better passmark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 860M vs 760

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

It managed to score P5339 in 3DMark 11 performance preset and X1662 in the extreme preset.
GeForce GTX 860M | by Slobodan-Simic (Mar, 2014)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GeForce GTX 860M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

GeForce GTX 860M
18.9 fps
GeForce GTX 760
58.7 fps
Set decades after the events of Crysis 2, you wake up from a stasis pod to find long lost friend and squadmate "Psycho" who explains how C.E.L.L has virtually taken over the world by monopolizing energy production in Crysis 3.
GeForce GTX 760 | by techPowerUp!

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Read more

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
@gamertaboo:disqus Yeah, but the important thing to take away is that the mobile part is less than half as performant as the desktop part.
gtx 860m has a 6.4 here and a 7.7 in a different comparison?
760 FTW!
comments powered by Disqus