GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 860M vs 765M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M  based on its gaming and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 860M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M

Report a correction
Much higher dead space 3 framerate 84.5 fps vs 70.1 fps More than 20% higher dead space 3 framerate
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,220.5 vs 4,021 More than 5.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 18,276.5 vs 13,390 More than 35% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 4,008 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 863 MHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Better T-Rex score 3.43 frames/s vs 0.73 frames/s Around 4.8x better T-Rex score
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 1,002 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 41.57 fps vs 23.25 fps Around 80% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Slightly better cloud gate factor score 17.52 vs 15.84 More than 10% better cloud gate factor score
Slightly higher crysis 3 framerate 18.8 vs 14.2 More than 30% higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly higher crysis 3 framerate 18.75 fps vs 14.2 fps More than 30% higher crysis 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 4,902 More than 4x better 3DMark06 score
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 105.24 fps More than 5% higher diablo III framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 860M vs 765M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 860M
162.9 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 765M
23.98 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 860M
45.89 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 765M
8.79 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
They seem to quite often mix up 3DMark results across the different versions.
Dunno, these numbers seem sketchy though, I've got a 765m laptop and my friend has one of the new 870m laptops, and there's not even this big of a difference between ours for Bioshock, not tested the difference with Crysis. But either way, the 860m either would have to be more powerful than the 870m, or something has gone wrong in their testing, I'm guessing the latter.
Why is there such a huge difference in the 3DMark06 benchmark?
comments powered by Disqus