GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 880M vs 780 Ti among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 880M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M

Report a correction
Significantly more memory 8,192 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 2.8x more memory
Higher clock speed 954 MHz vs 875 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Better video composition score 71.28 frames/s vs 58.07 frames/s Around 25% better video composition score
Significantly lower TDP 122W vs 250W 2x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 8,890 vs 3,577 Around 2.5x better PassMark score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 46,186 vs 29,582 More than 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 336 GB/s vs 160 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 15,630 vs 8,212 More than 90% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 5,000 MHz 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Much better T-Rex score 5,412.31 vs 3,359.5 More than 60% better T-Rex score
Better floating-point performance 5,040 GFLOPS vs 2,930.7 GFLOPS More than 70% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 210 GTexel/s vs 122.1 GTexel/s More than 70% higher texture rate
Significantly more texture mapping units 240 vs 128 112 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 52.5 GPixel/s vs 30.53 GPixel/s More than 70% higher pixel rate
Significantly more shading units 2,880 vs 1,536 1344 more shading units
Better fire strike factor score 74.6 vs 51.88 Around 45% better fire strike factor score
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 60.3 fps vs 33.2 fps More than 80% higher crysis 3 framerate
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 116.4 fps vs 65.6 fps More than 75% higher BioShock infinite framerate
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 4,688 vs 2,344 2x better PassMark direct compute score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,752 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 40% higher memory clock speed
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 85.4 vs 46.2 Around 85% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Slightly wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 880M vs 780 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 880M
82.51 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
182.11 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 880M
41.17 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
87.61 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
Really? Really? Really? Really someone can compare GTX 880M with GTX 780 Ti lol
Even Next gen GTX 980M will be slower than GTX 780Ti
Great work on figuring that out, Mohammad! I look forward to more startling discoveries from you in the future!
Laptop GPU vs Desktop GPU :P
comments powered by Disqus