Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 880M vs 860M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.7 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 880MGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,359.5 | vs | 2,890.54 | More than 15% better T-Rex score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark score | 3,577 | vs | 1,719 | More than 2x better PassMark score | |||
Much more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 4x more memory | |||
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 29,582 | vs | 18,276.5 | More than 60% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | vs | 80.2 GB/s | Around 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly higher texture rate | 122.1 GTexel/s | vs | 40.8 GTexel/s | Around 3x higher texture rate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,930.7 GFLOPS | vs | 1,305.6 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 33.2 fps | vs | 18.75 fps | More than 75% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 40 | 88 more texture mapping units | |||
Significantly more shading units | 1,536 | vs | 640 | 896 more shading units | |||
Higher pixel rate | 30.53 GPixel/s | vs | 16.32 GPixel/s | More than 85% higher pixel rate | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Significantly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 65.6 fps | vs | 41.57 fps | Around 60% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate | 42.4 | vs | 27.85 | More than 50% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,344 | vs | 1,593 | More than 45% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Better sky diver factor score | 351.61 | vs | 253.8 | Around 40% better sky diver factor score | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 23,220.5 | vs | 8,212 | More than 2.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 954 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher diablo III framerate | 105.24 fps | vs | 84 fps | More than 25% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Better bitcoin mining score | 162.83 mHash/s | vs | 82.51 mHash/s | More than 95% better bitcoin mining score | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,085 MHz | vs | 993 MHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 122W | Around 40% lower TDP |
Looking for a laptop?
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 950M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 765M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 870M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 770M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
880M vs 780M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||