GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 880M vs 860M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

GeForce GTX 880M
7.5
GeForce GTX 860M
6.2
GeForce GTX 960M
6.5
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

GeForce GTX 880M
7.0
GeForce GTX 860M
6.6
GeForce GTX 960M
6.6
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

GeForce GTX 880M
7.0
GeForce GTX 860M
6.7
GeForce GTX 960M
7.0
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

GeForce GTX 880M
7.0
GeForce GTX 860M
7.3
GeForce GTX 960M
7.6
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

GeForce GTX 880M
4.8
GeForce GTX 860M
5.3
GeForce GTX 960M
5.6
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

GeForce GTX 880M
8.0
GeForce GTX 860M
9.1
GeForce GTX 960M
9.1
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
6.7

Overall Score

GeForce GTX 880M
6.7
GeForce GTX 860M
6.4
GeForce GTX 960M
6.7

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M

GPUBoss Winner
 Front view of GeForce GTX 880M
Front view of GeForce GTX 860M

Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 880M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,359.5 vs 2,890.54 More than 15% better T-Rex score
Much better PassMark score 3,577 vs 1,719 More than 2x better PassMark score
Much more memory 8,192 MB vs 2,048 MB 4x more memory
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 29,582 vs 18,276.5 More than 60% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 160 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 2x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher texture rate 122.1 GTexel/s vs 40.8 GTexel/s Around 3x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 2,930.7 GFLOPS vs 1,305.6 GFLOPS Around 2.2x better floating-point performance
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 33.2 fps vs 18.75 fps More than 75% higher crysis 3 framerate
Significantly more texture mapping units 128 vs 40 88 more texture mapping units
Significantly more shading units 1,536 vs 640 896 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 30.53 GPixel/s vs 16.32 GPixel/s More than 85% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 65.6 fps vs 41.57 fps Around 60% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate 42.4 vs 27.85 More than 50% higher metro: last light framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,344 vs 1,593 More than 45% better PassMark direct compute score
Better sky diver factor score 351.61 vs 253.8 Around 40% better sky diver factor score
Front view of GeForce GTX 860M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,220.5 vs 8,212 More than 2.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 954 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Much higher diablo III framerate 105.24 fps vs 84 fps More than 25% higher diablo III framerate
Better bitcoin mining score 162.83 mHash/s vs 82.51 mHash/s More than 95% better bitcoin mining score
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 993 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 75W vs 122W Around 40% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 880M vs 860M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 880M
82.51 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 860M
162.83 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 880M
41.2 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 860M
22.83 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 880M
3,359.5
GeForce GTX 860M
2,890.54

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 880M
3,715.14
GeForce GTX 860M
3,719.08

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 880M
51.88
GeForce GTX 860M
33.42

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 880M
351.61
GeForce GTX 860M
253.8

Thief

GeForce GTX 880M
40.15
GeForce GTX 860M
24

Battlefield 4

GeForce GTX 880M
46.2
GeForce GTX 860M
28.85

Read more

Comments

Showing 4 comments.
John Peoples (10:30 PM, April 11, 2015)
Compared the 860m vs 460m and the 880m vs the 860m. In the first comparison the 860m scored 3dmark 11 of 22k. In the second 880m scored 22k on 3dmark 11 and 860m scored 8k. Plus this site performs so slowly....
Nitu Andrei (06:32 PM, July 4, 2014)
So is around 570 euro (780 dollars) (between an asus ROG G750JZ-T4152D with 880m and a lenovo IdeaPad Y50-70 with 860m) worth the difference?
Brandon (08:58 PM, May 17, 2014)
It is 75%. 75% of 19 fps is 14.25 fps. So 19 fps + 14.25 fps is 33.25 fps which is around 33.2 fps.
GrassThatCowsEat (06:49 PM, May 10, 2014)
the GTX 880M says it has a 75% higher frame rate in Crysis 3 when actually its only around 25%
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss