GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 880M vs 870M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M  based on its gaming.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 880M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 880M

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 3,577 vs 2,297 More than 55% better PassMark score
Much more memory 8,192 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 2.8x more memory
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 29,582 vs 23,989 Around 25% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 160 GB/s vs 120 GB/s Around 35% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 33.2 fps vs 26.7 fps Around 25% higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly higher texture rate 122.1 GTexel/s vs 105.4 GTexel/s More than 15% higher texture rate
Higher diablo III framerate 84 fps vs 75 fps More than 10% higher diablo III framerate
More render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 65.6 fps vs 52.2 fps More than 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher metro: last light framerate 42.4 vs 34.4 Around 25% higher metro: last light framerate
More texture mapping units 128 vs 112 16 more texture mapping units
Slightly more shading units 1,536 vs 1,344 192 more shading units
Better face detection score 41.2 mPixels/s vs 34.84 mPixels/s Around 20% better face detection score
Slightly better sky diver factor score 351.61 vs 295.59 Around 20% better sky diver factor score
Front view of GeForce GTX 870M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 870M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 25,112 vs 8,212 More than 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Lower TDP 100W vs 122W Around 20% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 880M vs 870M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 880M
82.51 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 870M
81.75 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 880M
41.2 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 870M
34.84 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
3D Mark11 is retarded.
So, why does the 870m score SO MUCH HIGHER than the 880m on 3DMark 11? Isn't the 880m basically a faster/better version of the 870m?
comments powered by Disqus