Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 950

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 6,612 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 6.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better PassMark score 5,206 vs 462 More than 11.2x better PassMark score
Much higher clock speed 1,024 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 2x higher clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 105.8 GB/s vs 24 GB/s Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth
Much better cloud gate factor score 18.45 vs 6.8 Around 2.8x better cloud gate factor score
Better floating-point performance 1,572.9 GFLOPS vs 120 GFLOPS More than 13x better floating-point performance
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,653 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 3.2x higher memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 32.8 GPixel/s vs 6 GPixel/s Around 5.5x higher pixel rate
Higher texture rate 49.2 GTexel/s vs 12 GTexel/s More than 4x higher texture rate
More render output processors 32 vs 12 20 more render output processors
More shading units 768 vs 48 720 more shading units
More texture mapping units 48 vs 24 Twice as many texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GT 130

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 130

Report a correction
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 950 vs GT 130

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
3,355.2
GeForce GT 130
2,106.85

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus