GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 950 vs 660 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 950

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,024 MHz vs 823 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 5,206 vs 4,121 More than 25% better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,612 MHz vs 5,600 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,188 MHz vs 888 MHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Higher pixel rate 32.8 GPixel/s vs 19.75 GPixel/s More than 65% higher pixel rate
Better video composition score 66.02 frames/s vs 35.42 frames/s More than 85% better video composition score
Better manhattan score 3,710.56 vs 3,282.26 Around 15% better manhattan score
Higher memory clock speed 1,653 MHz vs 1,400 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,495 vs 1,948 Around 30% better PassMark direct compute score
Lower TDP 90W vs 130W More than 30% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 8,351 Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 105.8 GB/s Around 70% higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 49.2 GTexel/s More than 60% higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 96 vs 48 Twice as many texture mapping units
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More shading units 1,152 vs 768 384 more shading units
Better cloud gate factor score 19.42 vs 18.45 More than 5% better cloud gate factor score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 950 vs 660

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
214.87 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660
67.94 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
77.07 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660
31.17 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
3,356.32
GeForce GTX 660
3,352.64

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
3,710.56
GeForce GTX 660
3,282.26

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 950  vs 660 

8.3
9.0
The game has been tuned to run well on most computer systems to let as many players as possible experience the game.
GeForce GTX 660

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
eu acredito que sim. Afinal, só pelo fato da 660 ser de 192-bit já demonstra um poder de motor gráfico superior à 950, ainda que aquela seja mais antiga que esta última.
Se eu tenho uma GTX 950 vale a pena pegar uma GTX 660?
comments powered by Disqus