GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 950 vs 770 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 950

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950

Report a correction
Higher turbo clock speed 1,188 MHz vs 1,085 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
Much lower TDP 90W vs 230W 2.6x lower TDP
Slightly better face detection score 60.03 mPixels/s vs 50.95 mPixels/s Around 20% better face detection score
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 8,351 More than 3.5x better 3DMark06 score
Much higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 105.8 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 49.2 GTexel/s Around 2.8x higher texture rate
Better PassMark score 6,099 vs 5,206 More than 15% better PassMark score
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 1,572.9 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
Significantly more texture mapping units 128 vs 48 80 more texture mapping units
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 84 vs 29 Around 3x higher crysis 3 framerate
More shading units 1,536 vs 768 Twice as many shading units
Slightly higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,612 MHz More than 5% higher effective memory clock speed
Better fire strike factor score 60.75 vs 44.05 Around 40% better fire strike factor score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 83.4 fps vs 63.2 fps More than 30% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,083 vs 2,495 Around 25% better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,653 MHz More than 5% higher memory clock speed
Slightly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 950 vs 770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
226.49 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 770
103.88 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
60.03 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
3,353.74
GeForce GTX 770
3,360.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
3,712.32
GeForce GTX 770
3,719.62

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 950  vs 770 

8.3
9.6
The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus