Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 950M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,349.09 vs 1,191.52 More than 2.8x better T-Rex score
Much higher clock speed 993 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 2x higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 1,807 vs 280 Around 6.5x better PassMark score
Significantly more memory 4,096 MB vs 1,024 MB 4x more memory
Better floating-point performance 1,271 GFLOPS vs 80 GFLOPS Around 16x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 39.7 GTexel/s vs 8 GTexel/s Around 5x higher texture rate
Higher effective memory clock speed 1,800 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 80% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 15.89 GPixel/s vs 4 GPixel/s Around 4x higher pixel rate
More shading units 640 vs 32 608 more shading units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 500 MHz 80% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 40 vs 16 24 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Front view of GeForce GT 120M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 120M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 14W vs 75W 5.4x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 950M vs GT 120M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
3,349.09
GeForce GT 120M
1,191.52

Comments

comments powered by Disqus