Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M based on its benchmarks.
See full details GeForce GTX 950M vs GT 130M |
Released March, 2015
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M
- 993 MHz
- 4 GB DDR3
6.3 Out of 10
by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)As for the Boost clocks, in practice that can increase the GPU core speed 15% or more over the normal value, with most games realizing a 10-15% performance thanks to the increase.
VS
Released January, 2009
Nvidia GeForce GT 130M
- 600 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR3
6.2 Out of 10
by Syed-Muhammad-Usman-Pirzada (Oct, 2013)Wow, #AsRock and #BMW DesignWorks USA’s #M8 Gaming Machine is a beauty.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 950M vs 130M among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 1,807 | vs | 304 | Around 6x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 993 MHz | vs | 600 MHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly more memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 4x more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,271 GFLOPS | vs | 96 GFLOPS | Around 13.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 39.7 GTexel/s | vs | 9.6 GTexel/s | Around 4.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly better T-Rex score | 3,357.38 | vs | 2,744.48 | More than 20% better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 15.89 GPixel/s | vs | 4.8 GPixel/s | More than 3.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 32 | 608 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 23W | vs | 75W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
