GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 950M vs 750M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 950M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 22,237 vs 2,543 Around 8.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 14,227 vs 8,200 Around 75% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher diablo III framerate 102.9 fps vs 66.6 fps Around 55% higher diablo III framerate
Slightly higher clock speed 993 MHz vs 941 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,271 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS More than 75% better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 15.89 GPixel/s vs 7.53 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,124 MHz vs 967 MHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Better face detection score 40.71 mPixels/s vs 11.78 mPixels/s Around 3.5x better face detection score
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
Higher hitman: absolution framerate 31.2 vs 14.3 Around 2.2x higher hitman: absolution framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 29.6 fps vs 16.3 fps More than 80% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,373 vs 733 More than 85% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 13,670 vs 4,444 More than 3x better 3DMark06 score
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,000 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better T-Rex score 3,362.4 vs 1,679.86 More than 2x better T-Rex score
Higher memory bandwidth 64 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 75W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 950M vs GT 750M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
139.85 mHash/s
GeForce GT 750M
27.59 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
40.71 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 750M
11.78 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
369.32 frames/s
GeForce GT 750M
397.28 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
3,718.34
GeForce GT 750M
3,715.52

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus