GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 950M vs 660 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 950M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 22,237 vs 6,850 Around 3.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 993 MHz vs 823 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Higher turbo clock speed 1,124 MHz vs 888 MHz More than 25% higher turbo clock speed
Better bitcoin mining score 139.85 mHash/s vs 61.74 mHash/s More than 2.2x better bitcoin mining score
Lower TDP 75W vs 130W More than 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 18,060 vs 4,444 More than 4x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 6.2x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 4,121 vs 1,807 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 25,130 vs 14,227 More than 75% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 39.7 GTexel/s Around 2x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 96 vs 40 56 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 55% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 1,152 vs 640 512 more shading units
Higher bioshock infinite framerate 57 vs 29.6 Around 95% higher bioshock infinite framerate
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score 1,948 vs 1,373 More than 40% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 950M vs 660

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
139.85 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660
61.74 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
40.71 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660
30.96 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
369.32 frames/s
GeForce GTX 660
727.04 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
1,679.86
GeForce GTX 660
3,342.27

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Bioshock Infinite

Metro: Last Light

Comments

comments powered by Disqus