GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 950M vs 770 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 950M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 22,237 vs 11,310 More than 95% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Significantly lower TDP 75W vs 230W 3.1x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 4,444 Around 6.8x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better PassMark score 6,099 vs 1,807 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 14,227 More than 2.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 4x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s More than 7.8x higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 39.7 GTexel/s Around 3.5x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 1,271 GFLOPS More than 2.5x better floating-point performance
Significantly better ocean surface simulation score 1,631.29 frames/s vs 373.64 frames/s More than 4.2x better ocean surface simulation score
Significantly more texture mapping units 128 vs 40 88 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 15.89 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 95% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 1,536 vs 640 896 more shading units
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate 70 vs 22.4 Around 3.2x higher metro: last light framerate
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 83.4 fps vs 29.6 fps More than 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,083 vs 1,373 Around 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 950M vs 770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
139.85 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
41.96 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
373.64 frames/s
GeForce GTX 770
1,631.29 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
3,349.09
GeForce GTX 770
3,357.38

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950M
3,702.33
GeForce GTX 770
3,714.32

Battlefield 4

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
<3
yur web"sith" is sheat
comments powered by Disqus