GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 Fake Card vs 950 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 960 Fake Card Retail vs the 950.

Front view of GeForce GTX 950

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 5,206 vs 1,557 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 6,612 MHz vs 3,608 MHz Around 85% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 8,351 vs 1,887.5 Around 4.5x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 1,024 MHz vs 783 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 105.8 GB/s vs 57.73 GB/s Around 85% higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 32.8 GPixel/s vs 6.26 GPixel/s Around 5.2x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 1,572.9 GFLOPS vs 601.3 GFLOPS More than 2.5x better floating-point performance
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly better fire strike factor score 44.05 vs 13.4 More than 3.2x better fire strike factor score
Much higher memory clock speed 1,653 MHz vs 902 MHz Around 85% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher texture rate 49.2 GTexel/s vs 25.06 GTexel/s More than 95% higher texture rate
More shading units 768 vs 192 576 more shading units
Better ocean surface simulation score 756.71 frames/s vs 302.51 frames/s More than 2.5x better ocean surface simulation score
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 2,495 vs 716 Around 3.5x better PassMark direct compute score
More texture mapping units 48 vs 32 16 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card vs 950

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 950
214.87 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card
12.97 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 950
60.21 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card
302.51 frames/s
GeForce GTX 950
756.71 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus