Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card vs 950 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 Fake Card vs 950 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 950GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 960 Fake Card Retail vs the 950. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 5,206 | vs | 1,557 | More than 3.2x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 6,612 MHz | vs | 3,608 MHz | Around 85% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 8,351 | vs | 1,887.5 | Around 4.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,024 MHz | vs | 783 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s | vs | 57.73 GB/s | Around 85% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 32.8 GPixel/s | vs | 6.26 GPixel/s | Around 5.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,572.9 GFLOPS | vs | 601.3 GFLOPS | More than 2.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Significantly better fire strike factor score | 44.05 | vs | 13.4 | More than 3.2x better fire strike factor score | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,653 MHz | vs | 902 MHz | Around 85% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 49.2 GTexel/s | vs | 25.06 GTexel/s | More than 95% higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 768 | vs | 192 | 576 more shading units | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 756.71 frames/s | vs | 302.51 frames/s | More than 2.5x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 2,495 | vs | 716 | Around 3.5x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| More texture mapping units | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card vs 950
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 950 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 950 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 950 vs R7 370 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 950 vs 760 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 950 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 950 vs RX 460 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs RX 570 | ||
