GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 Fake Card vs 960 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 106W vs 120W More than 10% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 960

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 32,987 vs 16,033.5 More than 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,813 vs 1,557 Around 3.8x better PassMark score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 32,171 vs 8,551 More than 3.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 3,608 MHz Around 95% higher effective memory clock speed
Much better 3DMark06 score 10,767.5 vs 1,887.5 Around 5.8x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,127 MHz vs 783 MHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 112.2 GB/s vs 57.73 GB/s Around 95% higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 2,308.1 GFLOPS vs 601.3 GFLOPS More than 3.8x better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 36.1 GPixel/s vs 6.26 GPixel/s More than 5.8x higher pixel rate
Much better cloud gate factor score 20.16 vs 11.92 Around 70% better cloud gate factor score
Higher texture rate 72.1 GTexel/s vs 25.06 GTexel/s Around 3x higher texture rate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 902 MHz Around 95% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 1,024 vs 192 832 more shading units
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 3,046 vs 716 More than 4.2x better PassMark direct compute score
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Better bitcoin mining score 111.95 mHash/s vs 38.68 mHash/s Around 3x better bitcoin mining score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card vs 960

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
111.95 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card
12.97 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960
69.13 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card
302.51 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960
780.9 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960 Fake Card
106.28 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960
710.39 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
3.92 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus