GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 vs 920M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 32,987 vs 9,003.5 Around 3.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,813 vs 711 Around 8.2x better PassMark score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 32,171 vs 5,032.5 Around 6.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 4x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 10,767.5 vs 1,731 Around 6.2x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 1,127 MHz vs 954 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 112.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s More than 7.8x higher memory bandwidth
Much better cloud gate factor score 20.16 vs 9.7 More than 2x better cloud gate factor score
Higher pixel rate 36.1 GPixel/s vs 7.63 GPixel/s Around 4.8x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 2,308.1 GFLOPS vs 732.7 GFLOPS Around 3.2x better floating-point performance
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 95% higher memory clock speed
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 75.8 fps vs 11 fps Around 7x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher texture rate 72.1 GTexel/s vs 30.53 GTexel/s More than 2.2x higher texture rate
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 3,046 vs 648 Around 4.8x better PassMark direct compute score
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly higher battlefield 4 framerate 58 vs 9.6 More than 6x higher battlefield 4 framerate
More shading units 1,024 vs 384 640 more shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Slightly better bitcoin mining score 111.95 mHash/s vs 40.41 mHash/s More than 2.8x better bitcoin mining score
Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 33W vs 120W 3.6x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960 vs 920M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
111.95 mHash/s
GeForce 920M
40.41 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
69.13 mPixels/s
GeForce 920M
8.36 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
780.9 frames/s
GeForce 920M
157.17 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Thief

Battlefield 4

Comments

comments powered by Disqus