Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 1060
GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 960 vs 1060 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 vs 1060 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | MSI GeForce GTX 1060GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 vs the MSI GeForce GTX 1060. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,544 MHz | vs | 1,127 MHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better PassMark score | 8,686 | vs | 5,813 | Around 50% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly more memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 3x more memory | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | vs | 112.2 GB/s | More than 70% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 74.1 GPixel/s | vs | 36.1 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,953 GFLOPS | vs | 2,308.1 GFLOPS | More than 70% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 7,012 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 1,759 MHz | vs | 1,178 MHz | Around 50% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 123.5 GTexel/s | vs | 72.1 GTexel/s | More than 70% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly better T-Rex score | 8.68 frames/s | vs | 3.92 frames/s | Around 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
| More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 5,049 | vs | 3,046 | More than 65% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 1,753 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 1,280 | vs | 1,024 | 256 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 64 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960 vs 1060
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 29 desktops with the GeForce GTX 960, starting from $998
- 79 desktops with the GeForce GTX 1060, starting from $808
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 480 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs 760 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 11 comments.
