Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 960 vs 1060 Mobile |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 vs 1060 Mobile among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 960 vs the 1060 Mobile. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 8,710 | vs | 5,813 | Around 50% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,404 MHz | vs | 1,127 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| More memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 3x more memory | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | vs | 112.2 GB/s | More than 70% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 67.4 GPixel/s | vs | 36.1 GPixel/s | More than 85% higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,670 MHz | vs | 1,178 MHz | More than 40% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 7,012 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,594 GFLOPS | vs | 2,308.1 GFLOPS | More than 55% better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly better bitcoin mining score | 496.27 mHash/s | vs | 111.95 mHash/s | Around 4.5x better bitcoin mining score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 112.3 GTexel/s | vs | 72.1 GTexel/s | More than 55% higher texture rate | |||
| More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 5,039 | vs | 3,046 | More than 65% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher thief framerate | 68.6 | vs | 50.6 | More than 35% higher thief framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 1,753 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 80W | vs | 120W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960 vs 1060 Mobile
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
