Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details | GeForce GTX 960 vs 470 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
7.1 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960GPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 32,987 | vs | 4,342 | More than 7.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 3,348 MHz | More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 32,171 | vs | 15,350 | More than 2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,127 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | More than 60% higher clock speed | |||
Better PassMark score | 5,813 | vs | 3,607 | More than 60% better PassMark score | |||
Much higher battlefield 3 framerate | 80 | vs | 30 | Around 2.8x higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,308.1 GFLOPS | vs | 1,254 GFLOPS | Around 85% better floating-point performance | |||
Much higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 837 MHz | More than 2x higher memory clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 36.1 GPixel/s | vs | 19.6 GPixel/s | Around 85% higher pixel rate | |||
Slightly more memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,280 MB | 60% more memory | |||
Higher texture rate | 72.1 GTexel/s | vs | 39.2 GTexel/s | Around 85% higher texture rate | |||
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 75.8 fps | vs | 32.8 fps | More than 2.2x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 448 | 576 more shading units | |||
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 3,046 | vs | 1,340 | More than 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Better cloud gate factor score | 20.16 | vs | 17.95 | More than 10% better cloud gate factor score | |||
Slightly better T-Rex score | 3.92 frames/s | vs | 3.26 frames/s | Around 20% better T-Rex score | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 120W | vs | 215W | Around 45% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 22,622 | vs | 10,767.5 | More than 2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 133.9 GB/s | vs | 112.2 GB/s | Around 20% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly wider memory bus | 320 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2.5x wider memory bus | |||
More render output processors | 40 | vs | 32 | 8 more render output processors |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs R9 380 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 760 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||