GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 vs 650 Ti Boost among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 32,987 vs 5,770 Around 5.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,813 vs 2,657 Around 2.2x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 32,171 vs 21,830 More than 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,127 MHz vs 1,006 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,108 MHz Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 36.1 GPixel/s vs 16.1 GPixel/s Around 2.2x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 2,308.1 GFLOPS vs 1,545.2 GFLOPS Around 50% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher battlefield 3 framerate 80 vs 64 25% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,046 vs 1,400 Around 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Better cloud gate factor score 20.16 vs 18.04 More than 10% better cloud gate factor score
More render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,527 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,178 MHz vs 1,072 MHz Around 10% higher turbo clock speed
More shading units 1,024 vs 768 256 more shading units
Better bitcoin mining score 111.95 mHash/s vs 55.1 mHash/s More than 2x better bitcoin mining score
Front view of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 17,060 vs 10,767.5 Around 60% better 3DMark06 score
Higher memory bandwidth 146.6 GB/s vs 112.2 GB/s More than 30% higher memory bandwidth
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960 vs 650 Ti Boost

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
111.95 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
69.13 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
25.21 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
780.9 frames/s
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
888.19 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

comments powered by Disqus