Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details GeForce GTX 960 vs 660 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 vs 660 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 32,987 | vs | 6,850 | More than 4.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,127 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,813 | vs | 4,121 | More than 40% better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 32,171 | vs | 25,130 | Around 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 5,600 MHz | More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher battlefield 3 framerate | 80 | vs | 50 | 60% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 36.1 GPixel/s | vs | 19.75 GPixel/s | Around 85% higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,178 MHz | vs | 888 MHz | Around 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,400 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,046 | vs | 1,948 | More than 55% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Slightly better bitcoin mining score | 111.95 mHash/s | vs | 67.94 mHash/s | Around 65% better bitcoin mining score | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 18,060 | vs | 10,767.5 | Around 70% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 112.2 GB/s | Around 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 64 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960 vs 660
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Bioshock Infinite
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 760 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 770 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 280X vs 960 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
