Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details GeForce GTX 960 vs 660 Ti |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 vs 660 Ti among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 32,987 | vs | 8,415 | Around 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 1,127 MHz | vs | 915 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,813 | vs | 4,686 | Around 25% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 32,171 | vs | 27,687 | More than 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much higher battlefield 3 framerate | 80 | vs | 46.4 | More than 70% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 36.1 GPixel/s | vs | 25.62 GPixel/s | More than 40% higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,178 MHz | vs | 980 MHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 57.4 | vs | 49.97 | Around 15% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 75.8 fps | vs | 62.9 fps | More than 20% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 3.92 frames/s | vs | 3.04 frames/s | Around 30% better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 36.1 fps | vs | 30.3 fps | Around 20% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,046 | vs | 2,546 | Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 120W | vs | 150W | 20% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 22,997 | vs | 10,767.5 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s | vs | 112.2 GB/s | Around 30% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher texture rate | 102.5 GTexel/s | vs | 72.1 GTexel/s | More than 40% higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 64 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| More shading units | 1,344 | vs | 1,024 | 320 more shading units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
