Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 960 vs 780 Ti |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
7.1 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 TiGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 32,987 | vs | 15,630 | More than 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 1,127 MHz | vs | 875 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,178 MHz | vs | 1,020 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 120W | vs | 250W | 2.1x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Much higher memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s | vs | 112.2 GB/s | Around 3x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 8,890 | vs | 5,813 | Around 55% better PassMark score | |||
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 46,186 | vs | 32,171 | Around 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Much higher texture rate | 210 GTexel/s | vs | 72.1 GTexel/s | Around 3x higher texture rate | |||
Significantly better floating-point performance | 5,040 GFLOPS | vs | 2,308.1 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
Better 3DMark06 score | 15,619 | vs | 10,767.5 | More than 45% better 3DMark06 score | |||
Many more texture mapping units | 240 | vs | 64 | 176 more texture mapping units | |||
Many more shading units | 2,880 | vs | 1,024 | 1856 more shading units | |||
Much better ocean surface simulation score | 2,201.43 frames/s | vs | 780.9 frames/s | More than 2.8x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
Higher pixel rate | 52.5 GPixel/s | vs | 36.1 GPixel/s | More than 45% higher pixel rate | |||
Much wider memory bus | 384 bit | vs | 128 bit | 3x wider memory bus | |||
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 60.3 fps | vs | 36.1 fps | More than 65% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 116.4 fps | vs | 75.8 fps | Around 55% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Better fire strike factor score | 74.6 | vs | 57.4 | Around 30% better fire strike factor score | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 4,688 | vs | 3,046 | Around 55% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 85.4 | vs | 58 | More than 45% higher battlefield 4 framerate |
GeForce GTX 960 | vs | 780 Ti | ||
![]() | 9.0 | 9.4 |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
GeForce GTX 970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 960 | ||