GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960 vs 780M Mac among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,127 MHz vs 771 MHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 5,000 MHz More than 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,178 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 50% higher turbo clock speed
Higher pixel rate 36.1 GPixel/s vs 24.67 GPixel/s More than 45% higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 40% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 780M Mac

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M Mac

Report a correction
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Higher memory bandwidth 160 GB/s vs 112.2 GB/s Around 45% higher memory bandwidth
More texture mapping units 128 vs 64 Twice as many texture mapping units
Slightly higher texture rate 98.7 GTexel/s vs 72.1 GTexel/s More than 35% higher texture rate
More shading units 1,536 vs 1,024 512 more shading units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960 vs 780M Mac

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
111.95 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
126.58 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
69.13 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
30.69 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
780.9 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
1,002.2 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
710.39 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
248.7 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
3.92 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
3.26 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
25.99 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780M Mac
39.78 frames/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus