GeForce GTX 960M vs 320M Mac |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,097 MHz | vs | 450 MHz | Around 2.5x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better floating-point performance | 1,404.2 GFLOPS | vs | 91.2 GFLOPS | Around 15.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 17.55 GPixel/s | vs | 3.6 GPixel/s | Around 5x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher texture rate | 43.9 GTexel/s | vs | 7.2 GTexel/s | More than 6x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 48 | 592 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 23W | vs | 75W | 3.3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 960M vs 320M Mac
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce GTX 960M | vs | 320M Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | GM107 | MCP89 | |
| Clock speed | 1,097 MHz | 450 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 75W | 23W | |
raw performance | GeForce GTX 960M | vs | 320M Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 640 | 48 | |
| Texture mapping units | 40 | 16 | |
| Render output processors | 16 | 8 | |
| Pixel rate | 17.55 GPixel/s | 3.6 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 43.9 GTexel/s | 7.2 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,404.2 GFLOPS | 91.2 GFLOPS |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 960M vs 950M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960M vs 860M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960M vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960M vs 970M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960M vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960M vs 940MX | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960M vs R7 M445 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
