GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 800M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 2,043 vs 573 More than 3.5x better PassMark score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 738 MHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s More than 5.5x higher memory bandwidth
Much better manhattan score 3,713.7 vs 1,123.28 More than 3.2x better manhattan score
Better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 141.7 GFLOPS Around 10x better floating-point performance
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher texture rate 43.9 GTexel/s vs 5.9 GTexel/s Around 7.5x higher texture rate
Significantly better bitcoin mining score 174.57 mHash/s vs 15.22 mHash/s Around 11.5x better bitcoin mining score
Higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 1.48 GPixel/s Around 12x higher pixel rate
More shading units 640 vs 48 592 more shading units
More texture mapping units 40 vs 8 32 more texture mapping units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce 800M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 800M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 15W vs 75W 5x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 800M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s
GeForce 800M
15.22 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s
GeForce 800M
4.91 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
795.24 frames/s
GeForce 800M
109.13 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
578.1 mInteraction/s
GeForce 800M
31.67 mInteraction/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
51.97 frames/s
GeForce 800M
7.25 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
3,353.98
GeForce 800M
1,601.66

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 800M
1,123.28

Comments

comments powered by Disqus