Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M based on its benchmarks.
See full details GeForce GTX 960M vs 800M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 800M among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 2,043 | vs | 573 | More than 3.5x better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,097 MHz | vs | 738 MHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,012 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 80.2 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | More than 5.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,713.7 | vs | 1,123.28 | More than 3.2x better manhattan score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,404.2 GFLOPS | vs | 141.7 GFLOPS | Around 10x better floating-point performance | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher texture rate | 43.9 GTexel/s | vs | 5.9 GTexel/s | Around 7.5x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly better bitcoin mining score | 174.57 mHash/s | vs | 15.22 mHash/s | Around 11.5x better bitcoin mining score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 17.55 GPixel/s | vs | 1.48 GPixel/s | Around 12x higher pixel rate | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 48 | 592 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 40 | vs | 8 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,253 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | Around 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 15W | vs | 75W | 5x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 800M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 62 laptops with the GeForce GTX 960M, starting from $699
- 3 laptops with the GeForce 800M, starting from $1,095
