Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 928 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s More than 5.5x higher memory bandwidth
Better PassMark score 2,040 vs 1,152 More than 75% better PassMark score
Better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 712.7 GFLOPS More than 95% better floating-point performance
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 941 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Higher texture rate 43.9 GTexel/s vs 22.27 GTexel/s More than 95% higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 7.42 GPixel/s More than 2.2x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
More texture mapping units 40 vs 24 16 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce 930A

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 930A

Report a correction
Lower TDP 33W vs 75W 2.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 930A

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
3,365.46
GeForce 930A
3,360.58

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
3,723.46
GeForce 930A
3,567.54

Comments

comments powered by Disqus