Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,353.98 vs 1,191.52 More than 2.8x better T-Rex score
Much higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed
Much better PassMark score 2,043 vs 280 More than 7.2x better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 5x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 16 GB/s More than 5x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 80 GFLOPS More than 17.5x better floating-point performance
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 2.5x higher memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 43.9 GTexel/s vs 8 GTexel/s Around 5.5x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 4 GPixel/s Around 4.5x higher pixel rate
More shading units 640 vs 32 608 more shading units
More texture mapping units 40 vs 16 24 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Front view of GeForce GT 120M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 120M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 14W vs 75W 5.4x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs GT 120M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
3,353.98
GeForce GT 120M
1,191.52

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus