Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 625 MHz More than 75% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 2,043 vs 466 Around 4.5x better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s More than 5.5x higher memory bandwidth
Much better T-Rex score 3,354.02 vs 3,257.86 Around 5% better T-Rex score
Better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 240 GFLOPS More than 5.8x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 43.9 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel/s Around 4.5x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 2.5 GPixel/s More than 7x higher pixel rate
More shading units 640 vs 96 544 more shading units
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 40 vs 16 24 more texture mapping units
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GT 625M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 625M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 15W vs 75W 5x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs GT 625M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
3,354.02
GeForce GT 625M
3,257.86

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
3,714.32
GeForce GT 625M
2,333.77

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus