GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 750M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much higher dead space 3 framerate 92.8 fps vs 39.5 fps More than 2.2x higher dead space 3 framerate
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 2,543 More than 9.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 941 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much higher diablo III framerate 121.3 fps vs 66.6 fps More than 80% higher diablo III framerate
Better PassMark score 2,043 vs 1,288 Around 60% better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 4,000 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS Around 95% better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 7.53 GPixel/s More than 2.2x higher pixel rate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 967 MHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Better bitcoin mining score 174.89 mHash/s vs 27.59 mHash/s More than 6.2x better bitcoin mining score
Slightly higher texture rate 43.9 GTexel/s vs 30.11 GTexel/s More than 45% higher texture rate
Better cloud gate factor score 17.8 vs 13.2 Around 35% better cloud gate factor score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.3 fps vs 16.3 fps More than 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
Higher metro: last light framerate 31.05 vs 11.85 More than 2.5x higher metro: last light framerate
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
Higher crysis 3 framerate 20.75 fps vs 9.85 fps More than 2x higher crysis 3 framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,479 vs 733 More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 13,670 vs 5,277 More than 2.5x better 3DMark06 score
Much better T-Rex score 3,362.4 vs 1,927.99 Around 75% better T-Rex score
Lower TDP 50W vs 75W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs GT 750M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.89 mHash/s
GeForce GT 750M
27.59 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
53.96 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 750M
11.78 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
2,851.98
GeForce GT 750M
3,715.52

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Comments

comments powered by Disqus