GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 660 Ti among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.5

Overall Score

Winner
GeForce GTX 660 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 660 Ti  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 8,415 More than 2.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 915 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 980 MHz 20% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 75W vs 150W 2x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 22,997 vs 5,277 More than 4.2x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 4,686 vs 2,043 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Much higher diablo III framerate 217.7 fps vs 121.3 fps Around 80% higher diablo III framerate
Higher memory bandwidth 144.2 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 80% higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 102.5 GTexel/s vs 43.9 GTexel/s More than 2.2x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 112 vs 40 72 more texture mapping units
Better floating-point performance 2,459.5 GFLOPS vs 1,404.2 GFLOPS More than 75% better floating-point performance
More shading units 1,344 vs 640 704 more shading units
Slightly higher pixel rate 25.62 GPixel/s vs 17.55 GPixel/s More than 45% higher pixel rate
Better cloud gate factor score 20.13 vs 17.8 Around 15% better cloud gate factor score
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,546 vs 1,479 More than 70% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Higher crysis 3 framerate 30.3 fps vs 20.75 fps More than 45% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 62.9 fps vs 45.3 fps Around 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher metro: last light framerate 41.1 vs 31.05 More than 30% higher metro: last light framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 660 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
102.46 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
35.9 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus