GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 670M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 598 MHz Around 85% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark06 score 5,277 vs 2,698 More than 95% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 19,451.5 More than 20% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher diablo III framerate 121.3 fps vs 59 fps More than 2x higher diablo III framerate
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 3,000 MHz More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 20.75 fps vs 11.2 fps More than 85% higher crysis 3 framerate
Significantly better bitcoin mining score 174.57 mHash/s vs 52.9 mHash/s More than 3.2x better bitcoin mining score
Better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 803.7 GFLOPS Around 75% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 750 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 8.37 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate 31.05 vs 17.2 More than 80% higher metro: last light framerate
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.3 fps vs 23.1 fps More than 95% higher BioShock infinite framerate
More shading units 640 vs 336 304 more shading units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,479 vs 950 More than 55% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 670M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670M

Report a correction
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 56 vs 40 16 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 670M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 670M
52.9 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 670M
15.06 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Crysis 3

Comments

comments powered by Disqus