GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 675M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 3,218 Around 7.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 620 MHz More than 75% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 3,000 MHz More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher diablo III framerate 121.3 fps vs 73.91 fps Around 65% higher diablo III framerate
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 20.75 fps vs 13.9 fps Around 50% higher crysis 3 framerate
Significantly better bitcoin mining score 174.57 mHash/s vs 59.01 mHash/s Around 3x better bitcoin mining score
Better T-Rex score 3,353.98 vs 3,350.04 Almost the same
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 750 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 952.3 GFLOPS More than 45% better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 9.92 GPixel/s More than 75% higher pixel rate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.3 fps vs 28.6 fps Around 60% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher metro: last light framerate 31.05 vs 20.7 More than 50% higher metro: last light framerate
More shading units 640 vs 384 256 more shading units
Better sky diver factor score 260.76 vs 189.12 Around 40% better sky diver factor score
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,479 vs 1,021 Around 45% better PassMark direct compute score
Lower TDP 75W vs 100W 25% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 675M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 20,452.5 vs 5,277 Around 4x better 3DMark06 score
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 675M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 675M
59.01 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 675M
22.12 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Crysis 3

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus