GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 675MX among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

1.6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 675MX 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 675MX  based on its compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 85% higher clock speed
Much better manhattan score 3,713.7 vs 1,750.96 More than 2x better manhattan score
Better 3DMark06 score 5,277 vs 3,978.5 Around 35% better 3DMark06 score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 3,600 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Better bitcoin mining score 174.57 mHash/s vs 62.9 mHash/s More than 2.8x better bitcoin mining score
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 20.75 fps vs 16.3 fps More than 25% higher crysis 3 framerate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Higher diablo III framerate 121.3 fps vs 109.9 fps More than 10% higher diablo III framerate
Higher metro: last light framerate 31.05 vs 22.7 More than 35% higher metro: last light framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.3 fps vs 36.2 fps More than 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Lower TDP 75W vs 100W 25% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 675MX

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 675MX

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 2,376 vs 2,043 More than 15% better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 115.2 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 45% higher memory bandwidth
More texture mapping units 80 vs 40 Twice as many texture mapping units
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More shading units 960 vs 640 320 more shading units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,749 vs 1,479 Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 675MX

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 675MX
62.9 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 675MX
18.25 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Comments

comments powered by Disqus