Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 960M vs 765M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.7 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 23,777.5 | vs | 4,021 | Around 6x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,097 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,353.98 | vs | 3,343.45 | Almost the same | |||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 863 MHz | More than 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,012 MHz | vs | 4,008 MHz | More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly better bitcoin mining score | 174.57 mHash/s | vs | 43.54 mHash/s | More than 4x better bitcoin mining score | |||
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 20.75 fps | vs | 14.2 fps | More than 45% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 45.3 fps | vs | 23.25 fps | Around 95% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Higher metro: last light framerate | 31.05 | vs | 18.2 | More than 70% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
Higher diablo III framerate | 121.3 fps | vs | 111.7 fps | Around 10% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,253 MHz | vs | 1,002 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 1,479 | vs | 1,273 | More than 15% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 19,624 | vs | 5,277 | Around 3.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units |
Looking for a laptop?
![]() | VS | ![]() |
950M vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970M vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
940MX vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R7 M445 vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||