GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 765M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 4,021 Around 6x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Much better T-Rex score 3,353.98 vs 3,343.45 Almost the same
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 863 MHz More than 35% higher turbo clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 4,008 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better bitcoin mining score 174.57 mHash/s vs 43.54 mHash/s More than 4x better bitcoin mining score
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 20.75 fps vs 14.2 fps More than 45% higher crysis 3 framerate
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.3 fps vs 23.25 fps Around 95% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher metro: last light framerate 31.05 vs 18.2 More than 70% higher metro: last light framerate
Higher diablo III framerate 121.3 fps vs 111.7 fps Around 10% higher diablo III framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 1,002 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score 1,479 vs 1,273 More than 15% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 5,277 Around 3.8x better 3DMark06 score
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 765M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 765M
43.54 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 765M
8.83 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus