Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 960M vs 765M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 765M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 23,777.5 | vs | 4,021 | Around 6x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,097 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,353.98 | vs | 3,343.45 | Almost the same | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 863 MHz | More than 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,012 MHz | vs | 4,008 MHz | More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better bitcoin mining score | 174.57 mHash/s | vs | 43.54 mHash/s | More than 4x better bitcoin mining score | |||
| Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 20.75 fps | vs | 14.2 fps | More than 45% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 45.3 fps | vs | 23.25 fps | Around 95% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher metro: last light framerate | 31.05 | vs | 18.2 | More than 70% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
| Higher diablo III framerate | 121.3 fps | vs | 111.7 fps | Around 10% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,253 MHz | vs | 1,002 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 1,479 | vs | 1,273 | More than 15% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 19,624 | vs | 5,277 | Around 3.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 765M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 62 laptops with the GeForce GTX 960M, starting from $699
- 6 laptops with the GeForce GTX 765M, starting from $1,650
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 950M vs 960M | ||
 | VS | |
| 860M vs 960M | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 vs 960M | ||
 | VS | |
| 970M vs 960M | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 960M | ||
 | VS | |
| 940MX vs 960M | ||
 | VS | |
| MX150 vs 960M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
