GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 770M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 4,955 More than 4.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 706 MHz More than 55% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 50% higher turbo clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 4,008 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Better bitcoin mining score 174.61 mHash/s vs 87.66 mHash/s Around 2x better bitcoin mining score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.3 fps vs 29.43 fps Around 55% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 1,002 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
Higher crysis 3 framerate 20.75 fps vs 19.55 fps More than 5% higher crysis 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 770M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 22,486 vs 5,277 More than 4.2x better 3DMark06 score
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Slightly better PassMark score 2,638 vs 2,043 Around 30% better PassMark score
Much higher diablo III framerate 141.3 fps vs 121.3 fps More than 15% higher diablo III framerate
More texture mapping units 80 vs 40 Twice as many texture mapping units
More shading units 960 vs 640 320 more shading units
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 770M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.61 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 770M
87.66 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 770M
29.53 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Why Nvidia 7xx Serises has low score in 3DMark 11 Graphics
comments powered by Disqus