GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 950 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 1,024 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 950

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 5,206 vs 2,043 More than 2.5x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark06 score 8,351 vs 5,277 Around 60% better 3DMark06 score
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,612 MHz vs 5,012 MHz More than 30% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 32.8 GPixel/s vs 17.55 GPixel/s More than 85% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,653 MHz vs 1,253 MHz More than 30% higher memory clock speed
Better fire strike factor score 44.05 vs 32.14 More than 35% better fire strike factor score
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,495 vs 1,479 Around 70% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 63.2 fps vs 45.3 fps Around 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher crysis 3 framerate 29 fps vs 20.75 fps Around 40% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher crysis 3 framerate 29 vs 20.6 More than 40% higher crysis 3 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 950

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 950
214.87 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 950
60.21 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus