Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 960M vs 960 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 960 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 960GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 120W | Around 40% lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 5,813 | vs | 2,043 | More than 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 32,987 | vs | 23,777.5 | Around 40% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 10,767.5 | vs | 5,277 | More than 2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 5,012 MHz | Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 36.1 GPixel/s | vs | 17.55 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,308.1 GFLOPS | vs | 1,404.2 GFLOPS | Around 65% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB/s | vs | 80.2 GB/s | Around 40% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,253 MHz | Around 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 72.1 GTexel/s | vs | 43.9 GTexel/s | Around 65% higher texture rate | |||
| Better cloud gate factor score | 20.16 | vs | 17.8 | Around 15% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,046 | vs | 1,479 | More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 36.1 fps | vs | 20.75 fps | Around 75% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 75.8 fps | vs | 45.3 fps | More than 65% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 640 | 384 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 58 | vs | 33.4 | Around 75% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 960
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Systems
Looking for a system?
- 62 laptops with the GeForce GTX 960M, starting from $699
- 29 desktops with the GeForce GTX 960, starting from $998
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 760 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 770 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 vs 960 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 5 comments.
