GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 960 among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 75W vs 120W Around 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 960

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 5,813 vs 2,043 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 32,987 vs 23,777.5 Around 40% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 10,767.5 vs 5,277 More than 2x better 3DMark06 score
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 5,012 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 36.1 GPixel/s vs 17.55 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 2,308.1 GFLOPS vs 1,404.2 GFLOPS Around 65% better floating-point performance
Higher memory bandwidth 112.2 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 40% higher memory bandwidth
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,253 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 72.1 GTexel/s vs 43.9 GTexel/s Around 65% higher texture rate
Better cloud gate factor score 20.16 vs 17.8 Around 15% better cloud gate factor score
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,046 vs 1,479 More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 36.1 fps vs 20.75 fps Around 75% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 75.8 fps vs 45.3 fps More than 65% higher BioShock infinite framerate
More shading units 1,024 vs 640 384 more shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 58 vs 33.4 Around 75% higher battlefield 4 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 960

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 960
111.95 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960
69.13 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960M
795.24 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960
780.9 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more


Showing 5 comments.
You mean desktop since laptops are PCs.
my friend was looking for IRS 1041 - Schedule K-1 last year and was told about a web service with lots of sample forms . If you are searching for IRS 1041 - Schedule K-1 too , here's a <code></code>
960m have good performance ? Curious...
This is why pc is better than laptop.
Glad I bought a PC!
comments powered by Disqus