Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 960M vs 960 |
Released March, 2015
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M
- 1.1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by Anthony-Garreffa (Jan, 2015)Performance (overclocking, power)95%Quality (build, cooling, design)90%General Features (display outputs, etc)90%Bundle, Packaging & Software90%Value for Money99% Overall TweakTown Rating93% The Bottom Line: ZOTAC has crafted such a great video card in the GeForce GTX 960 AMP!
VS
Released January, 2015
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960
- 1.1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.4 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!Gigabyte has crammed three DisplayPorts, two DVI ports, and an HDMI port onto their board, which is more than anyone else.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 960M vs 960 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 960GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly better bitcoin mining score | 174.92 mHash/s | vs | 111.95 mHash/s | More than 55% better bitcoin mining score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 120W | Around 40% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 5,819 | vs | 2,042 | More than 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 10,767.5 | vs | 5,277 | More than 2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 32,987 | vs | 23,777.5 | Around 40% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 5,012 MHz | Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 112.2 GB/s | vs | 80.2 GB/s | Around 40% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 36.1 GPixel/s | vs | 17.55 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,308.1 GFLOPS | vs | 1,404.2 GFLOPS | Around 65% better floating-point performance | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 57.05 | vs | 32.59 | More than 75% better fire strike factor score | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 72.1 GTexel/s | vs | 43.9 GTexel/s | Around 65% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,253 MHz | Around 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 75.8 fps | vs | 45.3 fps | More than 65% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 36.1 fps | vs | 20.75 fps | Around 75% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 640 | 384 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,039 | vs | 1,925 | Around 60% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 58 | vs | 33.4 | Around 75% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 960M vs 960
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Systems
Looking for a system?
- 52 laptops with the GeForce GTX 960M, starting from $699
- 32 desktops with the GeForce GTX 960, starting from $783
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $251 | ||
| 1060 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 960M | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960M | ||
 | VS | |
| R7 M445 vs 960M | ||
 | VS | |
| 1050 Mobile vs 960M | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $251 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs 1080 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $251 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $251 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 5 comments.
