GeForce GTX 965M vs 960M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher pixel rate | 29.92 GPixel/s | vs | 17.55 GPixel/s | More than 70% higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,914.9 GFLOPS | vs | 1,404.2 GFLOPS | More than 35% better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 59.8 GTexel/s | vs | 43.9 GTexel/s | More than 35% higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,024 | vs | 640 | 384 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,097 MHz | vs | 935 MHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 550 MHz | Around 2.2x higher turbo clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 965M vs 960M
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 13 laptops with the GeForce GTX 965M, starting from $1,000
- 62 laptops with the GeForce GTX 960M, starting from $699
