Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050 |
Released September, 2014
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
- 1.1 GHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
7.3 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!MSI's GTX 970 Gaming is available online for $350, which is a $20 price premium for the overclock out of the box and the improved cooler.
VS
Released October, 2016
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
- 1.4 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.8 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Oct, 2016)NVIDIA's impressive Pascal architecture has some nice tricks under its 16nm FinFET hood, but the Twin Frozr VI cooler is 40% quieter than its predecessor (the Twin Frozr V), and it also keeps the card 20% cooler.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 970 vs 1050 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 8,563 | vs | 4,443 | Around 95% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,494 GFLOPS | vs | 1,862 GFLOPS | Around 90% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 109.2 GTexel/s | vs | 58.2 GTexel/s | Around 90% higher texture rate | |||
| More render output processors | 56 | vs | 32 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly better sky diver factor score | 428.4 | vs | 303.85 | More than 40% better sky diver factor score | |||
| More shading units | 1,664 | vs | 640 | 1024 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 104 | vs | 40 | 64 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly better particle simulation score | 1,122.49 mInteraction/s | vs | 542.95 mInteraction/s | More than 2x better particle simulation score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 58.8 GPixel/s | vs | 46.56 GPixel/s | More than 25% higher pixel rate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 4,375 | vs | 2,863 | Around 55% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 88.6 | vs | 54 | Around 65% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 1,178 MHz | Around 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 148W | Around 50% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 940MX | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 vs RX 560 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $349 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS | |
| $349 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $349 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $349 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
