Winner
GeForce GTX 1070
GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 1070 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 970 vs 1070 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 970 vs 1070 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 9.6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Generic GeForce GTX 1070GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 vs the GeForce GTX 1070. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,506 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 11,028 | vs | 8,563 | Around 30% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 5,783 GFLOPS | vs | 3,494 GFLOPS | More than 65% better floating-point performance | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 26,833.24 | vs | 3,715.92 | Around 7.2x better manhattan score | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 96.4 GPixel/s | vs | 58.8 GPixel/s | Around 65% higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 180.7 GTexel/s | vs | 109.2 GTexel/s | More than 65% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 7,012 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,683 MHz | vs | 1,178 MHz | Around 45% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s | vs | 224.4 GB/s | Around 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 6,724 | vs | 4,375 | Around 55% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 1,727.43 frames/s | vs | 1,225.93 frames/s | More than 40% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 87.79 | vs | 72.7 | More than 20% better fire strike factor score | |||
| More render output processors | 64 | vs | 56 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 1,753 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 1,920 | vs | 1,664 | 256 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 120 | vs | 104 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher thief framerate | 88.5 | vs | 75 | Around 20% higher thief framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 970 vs 1070
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 28 desktops with the GeForce GTX 970, starting from $1,159
- 83 desktops with the GeForce GTX 1070, starting from $1,125
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 980 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1070 vs RX 580 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 3 comments.
