Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 970 vs 1080 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 970 vs 1080 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 8.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,251 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower TDP | 148W | vs | 180W | Around 20% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,607 MHz | vs | 1,050 MHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 11,994 | vs | 8,563 | More than 40% better PassMark score | |||
| Much better floating-point performance | 8,228 GFLOPS | vs | 3,494 GFLOPS | More than 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 10,008 MHz | vs | 7,012 MHz | Around 45% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly more memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 257.1 GTexel/s | vs | 109.2 GTexel/s | More than 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 102.8 GPixel/s | vs | 58.8 GPixel/s | Around 75% higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,733 MHz | vs | 1,178 MHz | More than 45% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much better PassMark direct compute score | 8,106 | vs | 4,375 | More than 85% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 2,560 | vs | 1,664 | 896 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 160 | vs | 104 | 56 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better cloud gate factor score | 26.05 | vs | 22.23 | More than 15% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| Significantly higher metro: last light framerate | 131.6 | vs | 83.8 | More than 55% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
| Better face detection score | 143.9 mPixels/s | vs | 105.04 mPixels/s | More than 35% better face detection score | |||
| More render output processors | 64 | vs | 56 | 8 more render output processors | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 970 vs 1080
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Desktops
Looking for a desktop?
- 28 desktops with the GeForce GTX 970, starting from $1,159
- 91 desktops with the GeForce GTX 1080, starting from $1,449
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
