GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 970M vs 675M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 970M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 26,947 vs 3,218 More than 8.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much better PassMark score 4,048 vs 2,142 Around 90% better PassMark score
Much better manhattan score 17,094.62 vs 3,699.28 More than 4.5x better manhattan score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 30,252 vs 13,805 Around 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,038 MHz vs 620 MHz More than 65% higher clock speed
Much higher diablo III framerate 225 fps vs 73.91 fps More than 3x higher diablo III framerate
Significantly more memory 6,144 MB vs 2,048 MB 3x more memory
Significantly higher pixel rate 49.8 GPixel/s vs 9.92 GPixel/s More than 5x higher pixel rate
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 33.4 fps vs 13.9 fps Around 2.5x higher crysis 3 framerate
Better floating-point performance 2,657.3 GFLOPS vs 952.3 GFLOPS More than 2.8x better floating-point performance
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 3,000 MHz More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 83 GTexel/s vs 39.7 GTexel/s More than 2x higher texture rate
Much higher metro: last light framerate 52.3 vs 20.7 More than 2.5x higher metro: last light framerate
Significantly more shading units 1,280 vs 384 896 more shading units
Much higher BioShock infinite framerate 71.9 fps vs 28.6 fps More than 2.5x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Much better PassMark direct compute score 2,799 vs 1,021 Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score
Higher memory bandwidth 120.3 GB/s vs 96 GB/s More than 25% higher memory bandwidth
Better T-Rex score 4.16 frames/s vs 2 frames/s More than 2x better T-Rex score
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 750 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Better fire strike factor score 59.95 vs 30.19 Around 2x better fire strike factor score
More texture mapping units 80 vs 64 16 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 675M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 20,452.5 vs 9,904.5 More than 2x better 3DMark06 score
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 970M vs 675M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 970M
313.57 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 675M
59.01 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 970M
59.43 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 675M
22.12 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 970M
17,094.62
GeForce GTX 675M
3,699.28

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Crysis 3

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus