Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 970M vs 675M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
7.8 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 26,947 | vs | 3,218 | More than 8.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark score | 4,048 | vs | 2,142 | Around 90% better PassMark score | |||
Much better manhattan score | 17,094.62 | vs | 3,699.28 | More than 4.5x better manhattan score | |||
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 30,252 | vs | 13,805 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,038 MHz | vs | 620 MHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher diablo III framerate | 225 fps | vs | 73.91 fps | More than 3x higher diablo III framerate | |||
Significantly more memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 3x more memory | |||
Significantly higher pixel rate | 49.8 GPixel/s | vs | 9.92 GPixel/s | More than 5x higher pixel rate | |||
Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 33.4 fps | vs | 13.9 fps | Around 2.5x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,657.3 GFLOPS | vs | 952.3 GFLOPS | More than 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,012 MHz | vs | 3,000 MHz | More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher texture rate | 83 GTexel/s | vs | 39.7 GTexel/s | More than 2x higher texture rate | |||
Much higher metro: last light framerate | 52.3 | vs | 20.7 | More than 2.5x higher metro: last light framerate | |||
Significantly more shading units | 1,280 | vs | 384 | 896 more shading units | |||
Much higher BioShock infinite framerate | 71.9 fps | vs | 28.6 fps | More than 2.5x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Much better PassMark direct compute score | 2,799 | vs | 1,021 | Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 120.3 GB/s | vs | 96 GB/s | More than 25% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Better T-Rex score | 4.16 frames/s | vs | 2 frames/s | More than 2x better T-Rex score | |||
More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,253 MHz | vs | 750 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
Better fire strike factor score | 59.95 | vs | 30.19 | Around 2x better fire strike factor score | |||
More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 64 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 20,452.5 | vs | 9,904.5 | More than 2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970M vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970M vs 980M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970M vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970M vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970M vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970M vs 880M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970M vs 870M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 950 | ||