Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Mobile based on its .
See full details GeForce GTX 980 Mobile vs 1060 Mobile |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 980 Mobile vs 1060 Mobile among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 9.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 9,579 | vs | 8,710 | Around 10% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 6,144 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s | vs | 192.2 GB/s | More than 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 4,358 GFLOPS | vs | 3,594 GFLOPS | More than 20% better floating-point performance | |||
| More shading units | 2,048 | vs | 1,280 | 768 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| More render output processors | 64 | vs | 48 | 16 more render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 136.2 GTexel/s | vs | 112.3 GTexel/s | More than 20% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 116.35 | vs | 99.4 | More than 15% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 1,832.57 frames/s | vs | 1,693.51 frames/s | Around 10% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Slightly better cloud gate factor score | 22.51 | vs | 20.55 | Around 10% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,404 MHz | vs | 1,064 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 1,670 MHz | vs | 1,216 MHz | More than 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 7,012 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 1,753 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 80W | vs | 165W | 2.1x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 980 Mobile vs 1060 Mobile
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
