Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Mobile
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Mobile based on its .
See full details | GeForce GTX 980 Mobile vs 1060 Mobile |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
9.1 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 9,579 | vs | 8,710 | Around 10% better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More memory | 8,192 MB | vs | 6,144 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s | vs | 192.2 GB/s | More than 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Better floating-point performance | 4,358 GFLOPS | vs | 3,594 GFLOPS | More than 20% better floating-point performance | |||
More shading units | 2,048 | vs | 1,280 | 768 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 64 | vs | 48 | 16 more render output processors | |||
Higher texture rate | 136.2 GTexel/s | vs | 112.3 GTexel/s | More than 20% higher texture rate | |||
Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 116.35 | vs | 99.4 | More than 15% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
Better ocean surface simulation score | 1,832.57 frames/s | vs | 1,693.51 frames/s | Around 10% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
Slightly better cloud gate factor score | 22.51 | vs | 20.55 | Around 10% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,404 MHz | vs | 1,064 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 1,670 MHz | vs | 1,216 MHz | More than 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 7,012 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 1,753 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 80W | vs | 165W | 2.1x lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 950 | ||